Upcoming Events

Asheville | Environment

no events match your query!
US Indymedia Features
indymedia.us main features

offsite link Reclaiming Sacred Dakota Land in Minnesota Friday September 05, 2008 12:52 PM

offsite link Half-a-Thousand Marched August 30 to "Stop War on Iran" in Melbourne, Florida Thursday September 04, 2008 02:16 AM

offsite link Sami Al-Arian Released After 5.5 Years in Prison Wednesday September 03, 2008 07:01 PM

offsite link RNC Day 2: Mass Arrests and Jail Resistance Wednesday September 03, 2008 11:47 AM

offsite link SEIU-UHW Stands for Justice Tuesday September 02, 2008 07:12 PM

offsite link RNC Day 1: Category (A) Hurricane Hits Downtown St. Paul Tuesday September 02, 2008 11:37 AM

US Indymedia Features >>

Oppose the Cliffside Power Plant!

category asheville | environment | feature author Friday October 05, 2007 10:29author by Sick of Coal Report this post to the editors

featured image

FROM THE NEWSWIRE: The Division of Air Quality refuses to hold public meetings about Cliffside here in Asheville. But guess what? The public hearings are happening anyway, thanks to the efforts of our grassroots-enviro groups.

However futile an exercise you may consider public comment to be, the upcoming meetings about Cliffside communicate a pretty clear message that grassroots organizations are ready to take energy policy into their own hands. The DAQ refused to hold hearings about the massive, coal-fired power unit slated for Rutherford County in Charlotte and Asheville, but groups like MVA and the Canary Coalition have decided to run these hearings anyhow. It seems like an attempt to facilitate a public outcry about the proposed coal-burning unit, which is beginning to look more like a relic of the certifiably insane coal era (which we are still living through, and inhaling, coincidentally) than a much-needed facility for electric power. Go to A-B Tech on Oct. 18 and say your piece!

Click here for details on the hearings.

author by chrystinepublication date Fri Oct 05, 2007 16:54Report this post to the editors

"If every household in the US changed a 60-watt incandescent light bulb to a compact fluorescent...the CO2 emissions from just two medium-sized coal-fired power plants each year would negate this entire effort."

from the New Yorker Magazine

author by Canary Coalitonpublication date Sun Oct 07, 2007 16:16Report this post to the editors

Canary Coalition Action Alert
October 7, 2007

Speak your piece to the DAQ on Duke Energy's plan to build
its new Cliffside coal-burning power plant in North Carolina
Sign up early to speak at the citizen's hearings

In response to the Division of Air Quality's refusal to hold more than one public hearing on the proposed Cliffside power plant, the Canary Coalition has coordinated two citizen's hearings in Asheville and Raleigh. A third citizen's hearing is being coordinated by Carolinas Clean Air Coalition in Charlotte.

Speakers will have three minutes to speak, but all are urged to also submit written comments (unlimited) that will be sent to the DAQ by the deadline they've set of October 31. You may sign up to speak when entering the hearing, but those who pre-register will speak first. You can pre-register by sending an email to the Canary Coalition, info@canarycoalition.org , or by calling toll free, 866-422- 6279. The entire hearing will be videotaped, with DVD copies sent to the DAQ and members of the news media. The DAQ has been invited to all three hearings, but has not yet responded.

author by nessiepublication date Tue Oct 09, 2007 09:39Report this post to the editors

If some of the rest of you want to change out lightbulbs or whatever, feel free. After reading and studing both sides of the issue, I don't believe that mankind is the cause of any warming trend (seems to be the normal warming and cooling cycle of the earth that's been going on for centuries) and I'm not going to alter what I do based upon something that's just not the problem. If someone else wants to double-up to cover for me, go right ahead.

author by savingspublication date Sat Oct 13, 2007 19:46Report this post to the editors

jeez,
not gonna change those light bulbs? Proud to do your part to make rich energy companies even richer? Since you like throwin' money away, will you mail me some?

by any measure those lil bulbs that you dismiss will lower your power bill and save you money. nice conservative principle there, saving money. but fuck it, the CEO of Progress or Duke or whatever assholes sell y'all power needs a new hot tub or Jag or somethin' like that. so be a good american and give money to people who already have lots.

dumb ass.

author by debate coachpublication date Thu Nov 08, 2007 04:34Report this post to the editors

COAL the FULE of the FUTURE
Cleaner coal technology is making coal a very attractive energy source.

Sometimes we use our ecomagination to reinvent the way we use an existing resource. GE's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) system converts coal into a cleaner burning fuel. This fuel is then burned in a gas turbine combined cycle system to generate electricity.

GE's IGCC "Cleaner Coal" process emits less than half of the sulfur dioxides, nitrogen oxides, mercury and particulate matter of a traditional pulverized coal plant, making the use of coal for power significantly cleaner. Plus, the process uses less water than a traditional plant, strengthening the environmental benefits of Cleaner Coal.

More information about cleaner coal

IGCC technology produces powerful results:
One GE IGCC plant, designed for 600 megawatts, will be able to power more than 400,000 homes in the U.S.

Over a 25-year lifespan a GE IGCC plant being designed today for 600 megawatts is expected to provide significant emission reductions when compared to recently permitted pulverized coal technology, including:
» more than two million tons of carbon dioxide.
» more than 67,000 tons of sulfur dioxide.
» nearly 26,000 tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxide.

If all conventional coal plants operating in the U.S. today could have been built with GE's IGCC technology, the result would be annual reductions of:
» more than 320 million tons of carbon dioxide, or nearly one quarter of the greenhouse gas reduction goal proposed for the U.S. under the Kyoto Protocol
» more than 1.8 million tons of sulfur dioxide
» more than 1.2 million tons of smog-causing nitrogen oxides
» nearly 390 billion gallons of water, or enough water for more than 3.6 million U.S. households for one year

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, IGCC technology can reduce mercury emissions by half when compared to conventional coal technology.

we hold new hope for this progressive energy sorce
as our childrens future is depending on it.

the Nessie files

Cleaner coal technology is making coal a very attractive energy source.

Sometimes we use our ecomagination to reinvent the way we use an existing resource. GE's Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) system converts coal into a cleaner burning fuel. This fuel is then burned in a gas turbine combined cycle system to generate electricity.

GE's IGCC "Cleaner Coal" process emits less than half of the sulfur dioxides, nitrogen oxides, mercury and particulate matter of a traditional pulverized coal plant, making the use of coal for power significantly cleaner. Plus, the process uses less water than a traditional plant, strengthening the environmental benefits of Cleaner Coal.

More information about cleaner coal

IGCC technology produces powerful results:
One GE IGCC plant, designed for 600 megawatts, will be able to power more than 400,000 homes in the U.S.

Over a 25-year lifespan a GE IGCC plant being designed today for 600 megawatts is expected to provide significant emission reductions when compared to recently permitted pulverized coal technology, including:
» more than two million tons of carbon dioxide.
» more than 67,000 tons of sulfur dioxide.
» nearly 26,000 tons of smog-forming nitrogen oxide.

If all conventional coal plants operating in the U.S. today could have been built with GE's IGCC technology, the result would be annual reductions of:
» more than 320 million tons of carbon dioxide, or nearly one quarter of the greenhouse gas reduction goal proposed for the U.S. under the Kyoto Protocol
» more than 1.8 million tons of sulfur dioxide
» more than 1.2 million tons of smog-causing nitrogen oxides
» nearly 390 billion gallons of water, or enough water for more than 3.6 million U.S. households for one year

According to the U.S. Department of Energy, IGCC technology can reduce mercury emissions by half when compared to conventional coal technology.

author by this is a forgerypublication date Mon Nov 12, 2007 18:24Report this post to the editors

This is a forgery, one of many. For some idea how often nessie's name gets forged, Google "nessie indymedia forgery" and see what comes up.

http://tinyurl.com/38z6t8

This particular forgery is also spam:

http://tinyurl.com/2zx54v

Number of comments per page
  
 
Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by Asheville Independent Media Center. Disclaimer